Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Samantha Vanderslott, Andrew Pollard and Seilesh Kadambari discuss vaccine uptake among Black, Asian and minority ethnic communities in an article for The Conversation.

© Image by pisauikan from Pixabay

Some of the highest rates of death and serious illness during the pandemic have been among Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) communities. According to government data, Black ethnic groups have the highest diagnosis rates of COVID-19 and people of Bangladeshi ethnicity have twice the risk of death compared to those of white British ethnicity. Other ethnic groups (Chinese, Indian, Pakistani, other Asian, Caribbean and other Black) had 10%-50% higher risk of death compared to white British people.

Vaccination provides the most effective form of protection against COVID-19. But vaccine hesitancy is higher among some BAME groups than people from a white ethnic background, and uptake is lower.

Alarmingly, lower vaccine uptake and increased hesitancy are also higher among people from ethnic minority backgrounds who are over 80, those living in socioeconomically deprived areas and healthcare workers. These groups are at greatest risk of developing severe infection. In England, at the start of the national vaccine rollout, a study showed Black people over the age of 80 were only half as likely as white people in that age group to have been vaccinated.

Not all of this is down to vaccine hesitancy – the authors of the study have noted that logistical factors may also be at play in the differing rates of vaccination. But vaccine hesitancy remains a matter of concern, with reports from healthcare workers that people from BAME groups continue to be worried about safety, religious acceptability, and fears of being treated as experimental subjects.

As a result, several national initiatives are attempting to address lower COVID-19 vaccine uptake among ethnic minority communities.

This includes a government campaign that uses celebrity adverts, social media videos and community champions to encourage take-up. A recent TV broadcast featured personalities such as Denise Lewis, Romesh Ranganathan and David Olusoga all urging people to get vaccinated. Meanwhile, medical leaders have joined with important non-profit organisations like the Caribbean and African Health Network to encourage vaccine uptake.

These initiatives are important in promoting public health information to millions of people hesitant about getting a vaccine. But as a form of one-way communication, they may not reach everyone, especially those who feel socially marginalised during the pandemic. That’s why we believe that more individual engagement and working with specialist media outlets both form an essential component of tackling misinformation, addressing hesitancy and ensuring informed decision-making to improve vaccine uptake.

Listening to questions, respecting concerns, and tailoring information based on evidence are critical to building trust. As frontline clinicians and researchers, we have seen first-hand the immediate impact of direct engagement with BAME groups on vaccine hesitancy. This includes holding informal Q&As in our hospital, hosting video meetings with local religious and community organisations and communicating through media outlets that cater to specific minority groups.

The importance of talking

The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control has found that directly targeted programmes using a dialogue-based approach – concentrating on conversations rather than providing information – were successful, particularly if they involved consultation between healthcare workers and patients.

In Australia and the UK, for example, specialist immunisation clinics offer doctors a space to talk with patients one-on-one about vaccine concerns. Here, doctors can directly address people’s concerns with specific, balanced information on vaccination risks and benefits. They also provide an opportunity for patients to return to ask further questions as they arise.

Frontline healthcare workers are central to a strategy of grassroots engagement. The general public regards them as the most trusted sources of information about vaccines. The Wellcome Global Monitor survey in 2018 reported that 73% of people worldwide trust doctors or nurses more than any other source of health advice, including family, friends, religious leaders or famous people.

The trust bestowed on healthcare workers has important implications given historical mistrust stemming from discrimination and inadequate or unethical health treatment that some in BAME groups have experienced. COVID-19 misinformation has also played upon these concerns in BAME communities. Despite this context, it seems healthcare workers are still the best people to deliver vaccine information to hesitant people.

Healthcare workers are under tremendous strain right now, and some may not feel well-equipped to make a case for vaccination. But there are resources available. For example, the Oxford Vaccine Group has information pages on The Vaccine Knowledge Project. This provides an independent source of information about vaccines and infectious diseases in more than 100 different languages.

Identifying those who are least likely to receive a vaccine and finding opportunities to engage with them is time-consuming, expensive and will reach fewer people than national campaigns. But we believe that encouraging a dialogue, respecting anxieties, listening to concerns and deconstructing misinformation through direct communication will increase the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine promotion and thus makes it worth the investment.

Specialist media could then help amplify messages further. Established and widely consumed newspapers and radio stations catering to specific communities have long existed in the UK, and can reach people national campaigns might not.

Developing and rolling out a vaccines to protect against COVID-19 has been one of the biggest public health successes of the past century. Ensuring that the most vulnerable groups have access to vaccines and are well informed about receiving it is essential to prevent disparities that have already been exacerbated by the pandemic from getting worse.

COVID-19: how to tackle vaccine hesitancy among BAME groups

Samantha Vanderslott, University of Oxford; Andrew Pollard, University of Oxford, and Seilesh Kadambari, University of Oxford

Some of the highest rates of death and serious illness during the pandemic have been among Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) communities. According to government data, Black ethnic groups have the highest diagnosis rates of COVID-19 and people of Bangladeshi ethnicity have twice the risk of death compared to those of white British ethnicity. Other ethnic groups (Chinese, Indian, Pakistani, other Asian, Caribbean and other Black) had 10%-50% higher risk of death compared to white British people.

Vaccination provides the most effective form of protection against COVID-19. But vaccine hesitancy is higher among some BAME groups than people from a white ethnic background, and uptake is lower.

Alarmingly, lower vaccine uptake and increased hesitancy are also higher among people from ethnic minority backgrounds who are over 80, those living in socioeconomically deprived areas and healthcare workers. These groups are at greatest risk of developing severe infection. In England, at the start of the national vaccine rollout, a study showed Black people over the age of 80 were only half as likely as white people in that age group to have been vaccinated.

Not all of this is down to vaccine hesitancy – the authors of the study have noted that logistical factors may also be at play in the differing rates of vaccination. But vaccine hesitancy remains a matter of concern, with reports from healthcare workers that people from BAME groups continue to be worried about safety, religious acceptability, and fears of being treated as experimental subjects.

As a result, several national initiatives are attempting to address lower COVID-19 vaccine uptake among ethnic minority communities.

This includes a government campaign that uses celebrity adverts, social media videos and community champions to encourage take-up. A recent TV broadcast featured personalities such as Denise Lewis, Romesh Ranganathan and David Olusoga all urging people to get vaccinated. Meanwhile, medical leaders have joined with important non-profit organisations like the Caribbean and African Health Network to encourage vaccine uptake.

These initiatives are important in promoting public health information to millions of people hesitant about getting a vaccine. But as a form of one-way communication, they may not reach everyone, especially those who feel socially marginalised during the pandemic. That’s why we believe that more individual engagement and working with specialist media outlets both form an essential component of tackling misinformation, addressing hesitancy and ensuring informed decision-making to improve vaccine uptake.

Listening to questions, respecting concerns, and tailoring information based on evidence are critical to building trust. As frontline clinicians and researchers, we have seen first-hand the immediate impact of direct engagement with BAME groups on vaccine hesitancy. This includes holding informal Q&As in our hospital, hosting video meetings with local religious and community organisations and communicating through media outlets that cater to specific minority groups.

The importance of talking

The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control has found that directly targeted programmes using a dialogue-based approach – concentrating on conversations rather than providing information – were successful, particularly if they involved consultation between healthcare workers and patients.

In Australia and the UK, for example, specialist immunisation clinics offer doctors a space to talk with patients one-on-one about vaccine concerns. Here, doctors can directly address people’s concerns with specific, balanced information on vaccination risks and benefits. They also provide an opportunity for patients to return to ask further questions as they arise.

Frontline healthcare workers are central to a strategy of grassroots engagement. The general public regards them as the most trusted sources of information about vaccines. The Wellcome Global Monitor survey in 2018 reported that 73% of people worldwide trust doctors or nurses more than any other source of health advice, including family, friends, religious leaders or famous people.

The trust bestowed on healthcare workers has important implications given historical mistrust stemming from discrimination and inadequate or unethical health treatment that some in BAME groups have experienced. COVID-19 misinformation has also played upon these concerns in BAME communities. Despite this context, it seems healthcare workers are still the best people to deliver vaccine information to hesitant people.

Healthcare workers are under tremendous strain right now, and some may not feel well-equipped to make a case for vaccination. But there are resources available. For example, the Oxford Vaccine Group has information pages on The Vaccine Knowledge Project. This provides an independent source of information about vaccines and infectious diseases in more than 100 different languages.

Identifying those who are least likely to receive a vaccine and finding opportunities to engage with them is time-consuming, expensive and will reach fewer people than national campaigns. But we believe that encouraging a dialogue, respecting anxieties, listening to concerns and deconstructing misinformation through direct communication will increase the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine promotion and thus makes it worth the investment.

Specialist media could then help amplify messages further. Established and widely consumed newspapers and radio stations catering to specific communities have long existed in the UK, and can reach people national campaigns might not.

Developing and rolling out a vaccines to protect against COVID-19 has been one of the biggest public health successes of the past century. Ensuring that the most vulnerable groups have access to vaccines and are well informed about receiving it is essential to prevent disparities that have already been exacerbated by the pandemic from getting worse.The Conversation

Samantha Vanderslott, University Research Lecturer, University of Oxford; Andrew Pollard, Professor of Paediatric Infection and Immunity, University of Oxford, and Seilesh Kadambari, Clinical Lecturer in Paediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Oxford

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Similar stories

Oxford Vaccine Group among winners at NHS Parliamentary awards

Researchers behind the Oxford AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine have been recognised for their excellence at a healthcare awards ceremony.

Mixed Oxford/Pfizer vaccine schedules generate robust immune response against COVID-19, finds Oxford-led study

Alternating doses of the Oxford-AstraZeneca and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines generate robust immune responses against COVID-19, according to researchers running the University of Oxford-led Com-COV study.

Delayed second dose and third doses of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine lead to heightened immune response

Research on the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, also known as the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, indicates that a long interval between first and second doses does not compromise the immune response after a late second dose.

First trial participants vaccinated with Oxford COVID-19 variant vaccine

The University of Oxford in partnership with AstraZeneca began vaccinations on 27 June 2021 for a new phase in human trials to test a COVID-19 vaccine ‘AZD2816’ in volunteers against the B.1.351 variant of concern – commonly known as the Beta variant.

Oxford researchers identify levels of antibody protection required to prevent symptomatic COVID-19

Researchers from the University of Oxford have today released their findings about the so-called ‘correlates of protection’ against symptomatic COVID-19; potentially a tool to speed up safe development of new vaccines which may assist regulators in assessing the likely potency of any new COVID-19 vaccine without the need for Phase III efficacy trial data.

Latest data on immune response to COVID-19 reinforces need for vaccination, says Oxford-led study

A new study led by the University of Oxford has found that previous infection, whether symptomatic or asymptomatic, does not necessarily protect you long-term from COVID-19, particularly against new Variants of Concern.